Vignette, Spring 2008
A short dilemma for discussion on who decides which practices are appropriate.
Hateful Comments
Your organization just partnered with a Black environmental justice organization to produce a survey about Black American’s interest in promoting energy conservation. You make the report accessible on your Internet site along with a comment section. The first comment is a very hateful statement that insults Blacks, saying among other things that they “waste energy with their loud music and cruising up and down the streets.” What should you do:
- The comment section must honor free speech; just leave it alone.
- Delete the comment because it does not follow your unwritten policy of permitting disrespectful comments.
- Create a written policy about disrespectful comments and monitor comments more closely in the future.
- Use the comment as an opportunity to examine the underlying factors that can help or hinder collaborative work.
Questions for Reflection:
- What are the potential consequences of a disrespectful comment to your partnership with the Black EJ organization and others that read the comment?
- Could no-action by you to the posting be interpreted as tacit approval of the hateful comment?
- Does freedom of speech extend to writing hateful comments?
- Who is usually the subject of hateful comments? How would that influence your perception of freedom of speech? How does it influence your decision about what to do?